subscribe Blog
search
Recent posts
The trouble with being right
(26 Feb 2010 02:22:27)
Holy humble heart
(12 Feb 2010 02:21:07)
AS GOD IS HIS JUDGE
(05 Feb 2010 03:10:40)
Myth moves me
(14 Jan 2010 06:05:52)
Last comments
I think this is exactly right. Buddhists can talk...
(19 Feb 2010 {ts '1899-12-30 04:55:34'})
Interesting post.  I agree with most of what ...
(12 Feb 2010 {ts '1899-12-30 22:27:39'})
A fair point. As I said, I'm no pacifist, however ...
(12 Feb 2010 {ts '1899-12-30 09:28:08'})
So why is the 'warrior' the one stuck with the nag...
(05 Feb 2010 {ts '1899-12-30 11:35:06'})
I couldn't agree more, the word spirit certainly i...
(16 Nov 2009 {ts '1899-12-30 10:47:18'})
Hey Nick, Great blog, I really enjoyed it... thoug...
(03 Nov 2009 {ts '1899-12-30 12:04:38'})
Indeed... it seems in some ways that religion and ...
(03 Nov 2009 {ts '1899-12-30 12:19:53'})
It is just unbelievable how the churches in the UK...
(23 Oct 2009 {ts '1899-12-30 13:56:19'})
As the developer of this site, I can truly appreci...
(30 Aug 2009 {ts '1899-12-30 03:36:58'})
FEED
[RSS][ATOM] All
[RSS][ATOM] spirituality
[RSS][ATOM] perseverence
[RSS][ATOM] humanity
[RSS][ATOM] dignity
[RSS][ATOM] compassion
[RSS][ATOM] worth
[RSS][ATOM] prosperity
[RSS][ATOM] spiritual abuse
[RSS][ATOM] justice
[RSS][ATOM] spiritual not religious
[RSS][ATOM] assumptions
[RSS][ATOM] bad spirituality
[RSS][ATOM] kindness
[RSS][ATOM]
[RSS][ATOM] bodies
[RSS][ATOM] joy
[RSS][ATOM] mindfulness
[RSS][ATOM] scepticism
[RSS][ATOM] rationality
[RSS][ATOM] time
[RSS][ATOM] work
[RSS][ATOM] courage
[RSS][ATOM] spiritual practice
[RSS][ATOM] politics and religion
[RSS][ATOM] liberty
[RSS][ATOM] tolerance
[RSS][ATOM] community
[RSS][ATOM] Unitarian
05 February 2010


I was not surprised by Tony Blair’s performance at the Chilcot Enquiry into the war in Iraq, because there were no surprises – he was sad about the deaths, naturally, but he had few regrets and still believed history would consider him in the right.



I had a letter published in the press back in 2003 when he originally stated his faith in history, in which I wrote he was therefore likely to appear in a revised edition of Barbara L Tuchman’s The March of Folly, a seminal study of how states pursued polices contrary to their interest.

 

I’m no pacifist. I’d seen Blair’s wars at first hand – as an aid worker I’d gone to Sierra Leone and Kosovo alongside the British forces – and in Sierra Leone in particular I realized what an impact for good military intervention could have.  But Iraq was different. Different place, politics, world post-9/11. War is not like the movies… it is messy, unpredictable and cruel seen from the ground and I don’t think it’s much of a surprise to find the last people who invariably want it are the generals.

 

So I went on the marches, I signed the petitions, wrote to the papers, although at the time it felt as if my practical concerns placed me in something of a minority – many of the protesters appeared angry because they felt in their guts it was wrong, while the PM was going to war because he felt in his guts it was right – God was on his side, and, as he said, would be his judge.

 

It’s ironic that Tony Blair went on to convert to Catholicism because the then Pope John Paul was one of the war’s most ardent critics, a position I suspect would be supported by his successor, although not necessarily for the reasons one would immediately expect. 

 

Benedict is very keen to emphasize the dual Christian traditions of faith and logos – Reason. This sprung from the earliest requirement of Christianity to marry the “revelation” of Christ with the Greco-Roman philosophical heritage. It needed to do this if it was going to gain acceptance in Roman society. Historically of course, logos has ebbed and flowed, but the German Pope, having himself experienced the terrifying consequences of Utopian un-Reason growing up under Nazism is understandably keen to reaffirm this bond.

 

The God of Benedict would by definition not expect one to do something that was intrinsically unreasonable. For God embodies Reason and Reason is how we discriminate between what is truly divine and just our egos, emotions or whatever. For Benedict, as for me, faith alone is not enough. 

 

For Tony Blair and George Bush however, it is apparently all. Never mind that they call themselves Christians – their God has far more in common with the Jewish, Islamic or, dare I say it, Crusader God.

 

Seemingly relying upon faith alone, they believed they were acting in the name of God, and they reaped what they sowed.

 

I don’t believe in Heaven anywhere other than upon this earth. There are no pearly gates, palm-fringed vacation resorts beyond our mortal life. But I do have a sense that each moment has an eternal element to it – although we pass through the length of our lives in a chronological arc, every day resonates infinitely.


Tony Blair told the enquiry that not a single day passes by that I do not think about that responsibility... and I do not doubt that he does. I don't believe he is a liar. But as he reclines in the comforting embrace of his certain faith, that nagging question disturbing his rest is God too: logos judging him, each day and forever.

Social Buttons: del.icio.us digg NewsVine YahooMyWeb Furl Fark Spurl TailRank Ma.gnolia blogmarks co.mments Reddit
icon date 03:10:40 | icon author Nicholas Axam
05 February 2010 11:35:06

So why is the 'warrior' the one stuck with the nagging faith issues for having made the decision to go to war?

The Pacifist free from any doubts for the none-the-less decisive decision to do nothing in the face of Saddam's disregard of the UN rulings?

When SecDef Rumsfeld was confronted with the Pope's comments on Meet the Press back in March 23, 2002 Rumsfeld reflected back on those who sought to avoid war.  It's an interesting exchange, on some folks who typically avoid judgement...

Russert: There are many in the world asking for more time for negotiations, for diplomacy -- the Vatican -- the pope issued this statement: "Whoever decides that all peaceful means available under international law are exhausted assumes a grave responsibility before God, his own conscience and history."

Rumsfeld: It's true.

Russert: And you accept that?

Rumsfeld: Indeed. It is a fair statement. War is the last choice. President Bush has said that repeatedly, and he has made every effort humanly possible to avoid it.

Russert: Yesterday in New York City and across --

Rumsfeld: Indeed, he gave a final ultimatum to avoid war: leave in 48 hours -- after exhausting every other step. He is -- I am sure very people could disagree with what the pope said.

Russert: Yesterday in New York City, some 200,000 Americans took to the street and protested -- there's video -- across the world. What would you say to those protestors?

Rumsfeld: Well, I -- this is a free country -- people can have their own views, and they always have. In every war, there have been protestors. The American Firsters filled Madison Square Garden repeatedly with thousands of people before World War II while Europe was in flames, while millions of Jews were being killed, and the chant was, "Don't get involved in a war in Europe." It's a natural human reaction for people to want to avoid war.

 

A natural human reaction that should be judged, just as Bush the Warrior is judged.  Not sure what God thinks, but I know History frowns on giving anyone involved a pass.

comment sent by Bill Baar
12 February 2010 09:28:08
A fair point. As I said, I'm no pacifist, however there seemed to me simply no need for this war. Saddam was a monster, certainly, but there are many monstrous rulers in this world. At a conservative estimate 100,000 Iraqis lost their lives as a result of the invasion - that's 100,000 people who may be still living today, men women and children. There was no link between Saddam and 9/11. This diverted attention from doing Afghanistan properly and encouraged Iran to further develop nuclear weapons. Politically it was just not sensible, it was fuelled by Utopian hubris and no homework. We deserve better from our rulers. War in this case was not a "last resort", it was a first. There was no threat to America or the West, indeed to be cynical Saddam could have even been manipulated on the side of the West as Libya - no human rights champion - and Syria, have been, and we may have encouraged gradual progress instead of seeking a quick fix. Instead all those people had to die, and, as a result of a resurgence of tribalism and religious fundamentalism, generations of women will be denied the rights they actually experienced under Saddam.
comment sent by Nicholas Axam